> From: Fargo Holiday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 10:49:30 -0800 > > In general I'd agree with Trausti, but one thing to consider is that XP, > since service pack two, only allows 10 tcp connections at a time, unless > someone has applied a 3rd party patch, like Lvllord's, and even then > that limit is re-imposed with most of the security updates that come > from Windows updates. I don't know what behavior this could cause, > since, last I looked, it wasn't a very well documented behavior. > However, on the anecdotal side, a client of mine (I do freelance > computer and network support/design) switched his workstations to XP > from 98 and was losing connections to printers. He has 6 printers, and > anytime the tcp limit was reached, one or more of the printers would be > taken offline and you'd have to re-establish the connection manually. > Anyway, simply because of this, I'd suggest using a more dynamic > connect->payload->disconnect sort of approach.
May be this is Windows itself approach, but this should not affect of course DBMS servers. E.g. MS SQL SERVER with sure can handle more than 10 connections :-) The same for Valentina Server. -- Best regards, Ruslan Zasukhin VP Engineering and New Technology Paradigma Software, Inc Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information http://www.paradigmasoft.com [I feel the need: the need for speed] _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
