Charles,
Charles Yeomans wrote:
I think that the main advantages are
-support for native Cocoa controls, either provided by the framework or
through declares
Then, as I suspected, this is a good news for Mac only apps.
-the opportunity to clear out years of crud in the MacOS framework core
accumulated during the change of event-handling schemes
I am not sure I understand, I am not such a long-user ;-)
-the ability to say "Cocoa" in marketing literature; this will finally
make those RB users that don't actually know what "Cocoa" means happy.
So, it is a "big show off", more than anyrhing. A sort of "Yeah, RB
supports Cocoa", but in reality, I don't use it.
After the overhelming thread about "What keeps you using RealBasic?", I
noticed that like me, THE main force of RealBasic, for RB developers, is
"Cross-Platform development".
Then, why loosing time and ressources with Cocoa? For those who want
Cocoa, then use Cocoa,no?
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Best regards,
Youri
Jon Johnson could supply the definitive answer, but I'd prefer he spend
his time working on implementing Cocoa stuff.
Charles Yeomans
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
