On Jan 11, 2007, at 2:01 PM, Frank Condello wrote:
On 11-Jan-07, at 2:48 PM, Daniel L. Taylor wrote:
With due respect to RS, I have to confess that parts of the IDE
don't seem to have a good underlying architecture. I really have
to wonder why editing a class with, say, 250 methods should take
any more time than one with 2 methods if the underlying data
representation is correct, whether in RAM or on disk. Why should
selecting and copying method 250 take longer than method 1, and
why should either take a noticeable amount of time? Why should
typing in a method in said class of 250 methods be more sluggish
than a class with 10?
Yup, there's definitely some serious speed problems with the IDE,
and some are easy to reproduce:
<http://realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=mxygccez>
I've been offline for the last couple days trying to use 2007r1 for a
project and I've finally given up and gone back to 2005r4
I have no idea what it's doing but eventually my machine slows to a
crawl, the finder pinwheels as does RB
Eventually I have to force them both to quit
I'm not even trying to run anything else at the same time as RB any more
Norman Palardy
OS X 10.4.8 / MacBook Pro 2.33Ghz Core 2 Duo / 2Gb RAM
http://www.great-white-software.com/
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
