I have pro, but wanted to know for troubleshooting purposes. I just wanted to know if Standard crippled the plugins in anyway. In the plugins I have seen, there does not seem to be a requirement to use Pro, unless the plugins used internal classes or methods.
But before we started developing the plugins, I wanted to make absolutely sure. Thank again -----Original Message----- From: "Norman Palardy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "REALbasic NUG" <[email protected]> Sent: 1/16/2007 10:48 AM Subject: Re: Creating Plugins: What Version of RB is needed? On Jan 16, 2007, at 4:37 AM, Giovanni wrote: > Sorry Tom, I know that, we are starting to port our ActiveX to RB > so part of that is to move our ActiveX to a Plugin. > > So my question is, my plugin will attatch to other databases so > does RB Standard Block that and does it limit any TCPIP/UDP > communications or should we have the PRO version for Mac to be able > to accurately test. I've never owned standard so I don't know if classes like Database, RecordSet, DatabaseRecord, etc are usable there They may not be EXCEPT if you use the REAL SQL Database IF that is the case then your plugin may not be able to provide those classes in Standard _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
