We already have class methods in RB - only they are called "shared methods".
I agree that pure virtual methods would be nice. It only makes sense to add such a feature if RB then enforces that any subclass MUST implement that method. ( although in many cases almost similar results could be achieved via interfaces or events). On 17/1/07 04:42, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would also be nice to have pure > virtual functions and class methods but I expect we'll get them > eventually. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
