It would be good to get a definite answer from RS on this matter. I can accept the case for them using an earlier version of RB than the latest release ( in fact it could be argued that it is essential that they do NOT use the latest release ) , but regardless of which version they use, it would be good to know once and for all. Maybe some of you guys going to the RS conference can ask around...
On 1/2/07 18:44, "Norman Palardy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 01, 2007, at 11:32 AM, Brad Rhine wrote: > >> On Feb 1, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Stefan wrote: >> >>>>> Right now the IDE and Frameworks need the attention IMHO >>>> >>>> Sure! RS has been swamped by the plan to make RB in RB >>> >>> Which, by the way, it still no the case >> >> Sure it is. The only part not written in REALbasic, as far as I >> know, is the compiler. It's not all done in the same version of the >> IDE that we use, but it's the same language. > > The only downside to it not being done in the same version is that > the developers at REAL might as well be working in CodeWarrior > The IDE issues we see they don't because they use a different IDE to > write the IDE > If they were using 2007r1 to write 2007r2 they'd be seeing the same > problems we are and that was supposed to be one of the benefits of > writing RB in RB > Until they are doing that they miss that benefit > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> > > Search the archives of this list here: > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> > _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
