Not a dumb idea. There are several requests to let us extend the
built in Database API, but no response (yet...)
In the mean time, I have a factory that I pass a recordset to and
generates a "virtual recordset" based on a dictionary subclass.
I have to customiase it for each of my schemas, but it is not hard to
do.
- Tom
On 02/02/2007, at 9:10 PM, Bart Pietercil wrote:
Hi list;
In order to abstract the Server database I'm working with I would
like to work in the interface with the concept of virtual
recordsets (recordsets not based on a underlying database).
I generate new Records ( through the data received from the server)
in my ServerDB class
Now I would like to add (or insert) the new records to a recordset,
something like:
RS = new RecordSet
RS.addRecord(myRecord)
but I can't find a way of doing this.
Having such a (readonly) recordset would allow me to use all
recordset methods for walking through the recordset and
Is this simply not possible (besides working around it through the
use of a virtual database), any other ideas to accomplish this result?
Is this just a dumb idea (wouldn't be my first) or is this worth a
feature request, or (best) it is available and I just overlooked
the obvious solution?
TIA
Bart Pietercil
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
