On 2/18/07, RBNUBE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just checking to see if I can get honest opinions about RB2007r1. > > I have been demoing it, but not often enough to get a true feel for all of > the bugs. I am not all that concerned with the new features, though I find > what I've seen be good additions. I am more concerned with performance and > bug issues. > > I still notice a few annoying things about the RB200X series, but these tend > to be issues of inconvenience, incorrect behavior and cosmetic issues. > > What about hardcore bugs? What have you run into? > > I always said that by the time RB2007 comes out, they will probably have > gotten their act together, but now I'm thinking I might have to wait until > RB2008. With the new structure at REAL, I get the feeling that bugs are > being ignored in favor of new features implementation and that really > disappoints me. > >
I generally like 2007r1, I like the new IDE and most of the time it's fast (occasionally slows to a snail's pace but then I relaunch). I agree that plugin development is slow because re-launching the IDE and re-opening your project is slow. Generally quite stable tho, thankfully. I think RS did a good job with this release. Here's hoping for more bug fixes and an incremental compiler for 2000r2. P. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter K. Stys, MD Professor of Medicine(Neurology), Senior Scientist Ottawa Health Research Institute, Div. of Neuroscience Ottawa Hospital / University of Ottawa Ontario, CANADA tel: (613)761-5444 fax: (613)761-5330 http://www.ohri.ca/profiles/stys.asp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
