Is this correct? I checked in the bundle... Executable have the name myAPP (i386).app and myAPP (Universal).app
The plist file also have these names ... And when a such app is launched, the app name in the menu is just myAPP (i386) Sven E ----------------------- REALbasic 2007R1 OS X 10.4.8 Intel and 10.4.6 PPC SEEdit Maxi THE XHTML EDITOR FOR MACINTOSH http://www.seedit.info On 2007-02-23, at 07:27, Tom Benson wrote: > This is only so you can tell the builds apart, as they are all built > to the same directory. And it is only a package name, the actual > executable is not renamed. > > Simply rename the built apps once you are done in the Finder, or > build a universal executable. > > - Tom > > On 23/02/2007, at 10:10 AM, TJ Hanson, PhD wrote: > >> I am building an application in Windows, Mac X, and Mac Intel. The >> name of the program is LogRules. During the build process, RB >> attaches >> >> -Mac OS (Mach-O PowerPC).app to the Mac X load module, and >> >> -Mac OS (Mach-O i386).app to the Mac Intel load module >> >> Giving each application a unique name does not change anything. The >> above info is still appended to the name. RB is using the name in the >> MacOSXAppName field for both the PowerPC and Intel versions. >> >> How can I get these applications to have just the name LogRules? >> >> Thanks. >> >> TJH >> >> _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
