On Mar 23, 2007, at 6:37 PM, Guyren Howe wrote: > On Mar 23, 2007, at 4:58 PM, Norman Palardy wrote: > >> That's not to say I have not found myself needing to return several >> items from a single function and have used byref to do so >> If you run into the need to do this on a regular basis you might re- >> examine the "type" being returned and create a class to contain that >> data or use a dictionary or array. > > <rant> <snick> > The simple fact is that we all write functions with multiple return > values now. Only we use ByRef which is completely invisible in the > call and the function and somewhat more tedious to use on both ends. > This isn't a ground-shaking proposal, but there is absolutely no way > in which it isn't better than ByRef.
</snick> > </rant> I don't use ByRef. Charles Yeomans _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
