probably, but we are thinking about general use and appeal to novice users.
I don't think there is any substitute for building stuff into the language. My sense is that when you extend, subtype or modify a basic type of object, you are doing it for your own convenience, not for general use. Isn't it better if we all speak the same language, with as few home- grown dialects as possible? On Mar 25, 2007, at 12:49 PM, Guyren Howe wrote: > Wouldn't it take all of about five minutes to write a Dictionary > subclass that worked however you wanted? > _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
