On Mar 27, 2007, at 4:16 PM, Arnaud Nicolet wrote: > Le 28 mars 07 à 00:14 Matin, Norman Palardy a écrit: > >> On Mar 27, 2007, at 4:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> On Mar 27, 2007, at 21:52 UTC, Arnaud Nicolet wrote: >>> >>>> Because if I suddenly want to do something using a disabled >>>> plugin, I >>>> have to restart RB (that is a long process). >>> >>> It's not a long process for me -- I wonder if it's long for you >>> because >>> you have so many plugins installed. That'd be ironic, no? >> >> Many plugins does affect the start up speed of RB as well as compile >> speed > > I have the feeling that they are longer in RB2007 than in RB5.5 > > Is it because of the format? Because of what?
From what I understand it has to do with how they are precompiled vs how they used to be handled That's where size matters as the entire plugin and it's entry points are read in and precompiled Larger plugins take more memory and that can cause some thrashing if you have little memory All this is second hand information anyways so I may have NOT relayed this correctly There are efforts under way to deal with this in later versions of RB _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
