On Apr 02, 2007, at 16:58 UTC, Terry Ford wrote: > This is pure speculation on my part, but wasn't there a comment at > one time that one of the eventual goals of RS to permit some form of > access to those "_" hidden methods in certain events built-in to RB? > I may be totally misunderstanding this as I am going from memory and, > at my age (60), I am beginning to wonder about it. :)
I don't recall any statements to that effect. > When I suggested a different "in-house" version I was imagining how > RS engineers would step through these methods when debugging Rb. Ah, I see -- they would need some ways to view and edit the framework code, but a special build of the IDE wouldn't be the easiest way to accomplish that. If it were me, I'd instead put in some sort of password or magic incantations that simply unlock those extra abilities, much like game developers do for debugging their games. > Nonetheless, it is very comforting to know that the goal of > developing RB with the previous release is a very reassuring sign. Agreed. Best, - Joe -- Joe Strout -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verified Express, LLC "Making the Internet a Better Place" http://www.verex.com/ _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
