On 6/26/06 7:09 PM, "Jonathan Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And source of problem is that RB is CARBON PEF, so it cannot work
>> correctly
>> with MACHO dylibs.
>
> It sounds like even if the IDE were Mach-O, there would still be the
> problem that the dylibs aren't being copied into the debug application.
In Revolution we do trick
we copy dlls inside of Revolution package itself.
But in RB yes, schema is different...
in xcode we have scripts which allow developer do
something between link and run.
may be you need such thing for RB also..
> Why don't you statically link in whatever the dylib contains? This
> would make life much easier for your users, not requiring to modify
> their application packages every time they build.
One of reason was ICU of IBM...it was dll only.
Now it seems we have way build is as static also...
But still can be other files.
This is not correct assume that you can pack everything
into single static library!
* second reason was -- DESIGN.
Valentina becomes more and more complex.
Some features can be big but not all users need them.
dll-design allow developers self chose required components.
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc
Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com
[I feel the need: the need for speed]
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
