On Dec 21, 2007, at 6:48 PM, Daniel Stenning wrote: > Later I may try removing the byref - even though it totally > invalidates what > im trying to do. > > Is no one out there doing this already ?
Every new functionality can be buggy, and given that a call into the shared method declaration leads to the error, you would want to experiment. It does not matter whether or not it would defy the functionality, you just need to track the bug, no matter what. Declare a simple method, no return value no byref and link it to a dummy REALproc, test and go from there to see what syntax is allowed and then report. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
