From: Kevin Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: sdk+jmf

Hi Jordan,
I have tried JDK 1.1.8 and JMF 1.x but still can't pass the
 "NoPlayerFoundException". As with JDK 1.2.2, I can run JMF supported 
media types such as http, file but can not pass any Real Systems
media types such as pnm and rtsp as url parameters. So how is the linking
done between JMF and the Real Player? I thought "java com.real.util.RJMFConfig"
will register the Real Player with JMF. When I call the method
"Manager.CreatePlayer", it identifies the media type and loads its player.
The configuration seems OK, as "Java com.real.util.RJMFConfig"
did not generate any exceptions. 
-- Kevin 


On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, RealForum wrote:

> From: Jordan Bigel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: sdk+jmf
> 
> Hi again Kevin,
> 
> First, there have been some problems experienced whereby everything was 
> set up properly, but a "NoPlayerFoundException" was still generated. We have 
> not yet nailed down what is causing this, but it ONLY happens with JDK
> 1.2.x - if 
> you would just try a 1.1.x version of the JVM as a test, I would appreciate
> hearing
> the results.
> 
> >The client (RealPlayer) has "G2 JMF", but do I need to download
> >the whole update or only "G2 JMF" component? Also in our environment
> 
> You only need the G2 JMF component. Basically this upgrade package includes
> 2 DLLs (native method implementations) used by JMF. They are not shipped with
> the SDK because they are platform specific. The DLLs are called rjco3260 and 
> rjjn3260 - both belong in the \winnt\system32 or \windows\system dir (and
> will be 
> placed there automatically by the upgrade installer). If the installer
> detects 
> Netscape it will also copy the rjjn3260 library to \netscape\java\bin and
> it will
> make a copy of rjmf.jar and put it in \netscape\java\classes. You might check
> to make sure these files are all in place (after you download the G2 JMF
> component
> from the Upgrade server).
> 
> We have not yet tried G2 JMF on top of the JMF 2.0 base classes. We are
> assured
> by Javasoft (and our review of the 2.0 spec) that this should not be a
> problem. However,
> you should try it with the JMF 1.x jar just to see if that is the problem.
> 
> Jordan.
> 
> PS. To report bugs in JMF or other Real products, go to
> http://service.real.com.

Reply via email to