From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Unix security concerns.

Stephan,

Thanks. The server setup script did not seem to set these fields up
appropriately ("%-1"). It does indeed seem to suid to the user/group
(works by name just fine). It can't however seem to restart the server
from the administrative interface because once it suids it cant re-bind to
the port :). Though not entirely impressed, I am much more comfortable
having this on the system.

Don.

On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, RealForum wrote:

 > Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 08:18:44 -0700
 > From: RealForum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > Subject: Re: Unix security concerns.
 >
 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stefan Stapelberg)
 > Subject: Re: Unix security concerns.
 >
 > On Oct 16,  4:28, RealForum Digest wrote:
 >  > Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 15:04:57 -0700
 >  > From: RealForum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 >  > Subject: Unix security concerns.
 >  >
 >  > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 >  > Subject: Unix security concerns.
 >  >
 >  > Help.
 >  >
 >  > I have been contracted to install the free server on a FreeBSD server
 >  > which I administer with the intention of purchasing one of the commercial
 >  > servers once the proof of concept is developed.
 >  >
 >  > Since the streaming occurs on a privilaged port I had to install this as
 >  > root. The server DOES NOT suid to a less privilaged user after binding
 >  > to the ports but rather runs around reading and writing files as root.
 >  >-- End of excerpt from RealForum Digest
 >
 >
 > Hi,
 >
 > when installing a server, I do the following: I create an user/group ID for
 > ownership of all server files (for example: 'realmedia'). Next, I create an
 > user/group ID for the ownership of the server process ('realsrv'). In the
 > rmserver.cfg, I set the variables
 >
 >          <Var User="%40000"/>
 >          <Var Group="%40000"/>
 >
 > to the numerical ID of the 'realsrv' user (specifying the symbolic UID
 > probably also works, never tried that). Then I change ownership of all
 > static files to 'realmedia' and ownership of all variable files to
 > 'realsrv' (important for the logfiles like adm_b_db/logs, enc_r_db/logs
 > and the logfiles in the 'Logs' subdirectory, which need write permission
 > for the server process).
 >
 > Depending on whether you want to use the graphical admin interface (I don't
 > use it at all), you have to change ownership of the files affected by the
 > admin UI also to the server user ('realsrv'). This would be at least the
 > config file ('rmserver.cfg') and the password files under adm_b_db / 
enc_r_db.
 > Note that in this case the server does not create a backup file when 
modifying
 > the rmserver.cfg this way; for creating a backup file it would also need 
write
 > permission on the whole server directory which should be avoided if 
possible.
 >
 > After starting the server as root, it binds to the privileged ports and then
 > changes process ownership to the user defined in the User variable. However,
 > it does not change the process group ID - probably because setgid() is 
called
 > AFTER setuid() :-} leaving still a potential security hole, although a less
 > dangerous one (they really should hire a Unix guru for porting their servers
 > to this platforms ;-) The error message in G2 after start of the server is:
 >
 >          E: Couldn't set group to %40000
 >
 > (similar than the one appearing in Real 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0 servers) but the
 > process ownership is changed successfully.
 >
 > Hope this helps.
 >
 > Best regards,
 > Stefan


*******************************************************
The RealForum is an email discussion group focused on using RealNetworks
products. The RealForum is a place to post messages about the best methods
for creating content using RealNetworks technologies and the planning and
implementation of streaming-media web sites.

If you ever want to remove yourself from this mailing list,
you can send mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the following
command in the body of your email message:

    unsubscribe realforum

or from another account, besides the address you subscribed with:

    unsubscribe realforum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to