>> Read it. Curious about the references to MySQL support. >> Don't we have it already? (mysql-protocol). If you >> want to keep rebol small, why add that which works so >> well already?
RB> I think this was just an example, referring to the port stuff. Yes, my take on it is that they want to make it easier to integrate things from the outside. >> >> For that matter, if one wants to keep rebol lightweight and >> nimble, why not sqlite support? RB> I guess, the mentioned "Resident Storage Method" goes in that RB> direction. That probably refers to the old RIF initiative. -- Gregg -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
