Yes you agree.
Maybe that general format could create some problems when one try to
exchange data from Rebol (e.g.: client application) and a server
(e.g.: java, php, etc...).

Actually, I'm creating a client rebol over a server Java (Jboss). I
partially solved the problem about datya exchange in this way:
java-server creates formats for rebol, and rebol send data to server
(java) creating xml. It works, but it is not really the best solution
(not much elegant, a little bit confusing for maintenance, etc....).


--Alessandro



On 4/19/06, Jeff Massung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't followed this thread in its entirety. However, why not just use
> REBOL as the data carrier? Is there any particular reason to use XML (whi=
ch
> is an absolutely terrible data format, but I digress) or YAML? Why write =
an
> INI parser in REBOL instead of just loading up data that looks like this:
>
> bob: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> jane: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The only reason to not use REBOL would be if you are dealing with an
> existing format, or dealing with a format that needs to be shared across
> different programs (of which some are not REBOL).
>
> Jeff M.
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to
> lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
>
>
-- 
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to 
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.

Reply via email to