Yes, I understand what you say :-( So I need to decide which way could be the best:
>> j/copy file1 file2 >> j/dir directory_name Or... >> jcopy file1 file2 >> jdir directory_name Even if the second one is faster for typing, in future it could create conflicts. More: the first way could be even used in a rebol application. I need to evaluate both the solutions. If you will have more ideas, please let me know! Thank you! --Alessandro On 5/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alessandro: > > > How can I do ? > > You could try: > > reb: make object! [ > print: get in system/words 'print > copy: get in system/words 'copy > ] > > That copies the original sytem words' values into the reb object. > > But it may go horribly wrong..... > > ....Remember that much of REBOL is implemented as mezzanines. That means = many > existing functions may be using the standard words. > > Example, assume that above object is defined, and you then redefine print= as: > print: func [xx] [reb/print "not implemented"] > > We can now use these: > > >> print "hello" > not implemented ;; as expected > > >> reb/print "hello" > hello ;; as expected > > But: > >> probe reb > not implemented > > Probe uses print, and print has been redefined. > > You'd need to define probe to use reb/print. > > And that could get to be a very tiresome iterative process of debugging R= T's > mezzanines. > > Sunanda. > > > -- > To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to > lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject. > > -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
