Wednesday, May 10, 2006, 11:57:54 PM, Pierre wrote:
>> The following problem remains: >> >> >> a: context [ x: 1 ] >> >> b: context [ x: 1 ] >> >> >> type? (in a 'x) >> == word! >> >> >> incognito? (in a 'x) (in b 'x) >> == true > Problem? That's not a problem. That's an obstacle. And reflects the > design design of REBOL. Whatever you call it, 'incognito? does not accurately reflect the way REBOL interprets 'alias. The parentheses in my example above have nothing to do with it. They are actually superfluous in order to prove the point but were merely used for convenience of human readers. Another way to show the inaccuracy of 'incognito? would be: >> a: context [ x: 1 ] >> b: context [ x: 1 ] >> xa: in a 'x == x >> xb: in b 'x == x >> xa == x >> xb == x >> incognito? xa xb == true Many other variations are possible. -- Best regards, Andreas -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
