Gabriele Santilli napsal(a):
> Hi Ladislav,
>
> On Thursday, May 11, 2006, 5:02:04 PM, you wrote:
>
> LM> Gabriele's version looks less comfortable and less reentrant than this
> LM> one, otherwise it may be a matter of preferences.
>
> I'm relying on the function's context support for recursion to
> handle recursion; depending on how multitasking will work that way
> may be a problem or not;
The reentrancy I mean does not necessarily refer to multitasking. It is
a question whether this test (or similar, more complicated tests) pass
or fail:
collect x [
probe collect y [
foreach i [1 2] [
x: i
y: negate i
]
]
]
> it just saves having a "local" emit, and
> it means that the code in the body can call other functions that
> call emit safely and it will work as intended (which is never the
> case with a local emit). For example, I use something like this in
> Wetan to temporarily capture the output from the FSM and reuse it
> somewhere else.
>
> As usual it's a matter of trade-offs. :)
>
> Regards,
> Gabriele.
>
-L
--
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
