Saturday, May 13, 2006, 3:31:24 PM, Gregg wrote:
> "emit <val>" reads well. I haven't looked at the new one long enough
> to lose my taste for the set-word! syntax in my dialected version.
> With the one we've been discussing, you could always say:
>
> collect emit [...]
>
> but that doesn't read well, because you have two active words
> (verbs) together, and it's nicer if the word arg is a noun,
> describing what it is you want to collect.
What about loosening collect to allow lit-word! arguments as well?
This would allow for
collect 'emit [...]
which may be more readable for some eyes :)
--
Best regards,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
