Ehm... sorry Nenad, but Carl said such things, not me :-) (the first phrase).
--Alessandro On 6/17/06, Nenad Rakocevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Alessandro Manotti wrote: > >> This is a discussion that's been going on since REBOL began. Why don't > >>> web-hosts have REBOL/core available like they do PHP or perl or Python > or > >>> Ruby on Rails and so on? If it's not because they're open-source and > REBOL > >>> isn't, then why? > > I guess that it's just because they are much more popular than REBOL. > > > I think such languages better fit server-side work. I think Rebol should > > "work" over rich-clients. E.g.: try to write with Rebol an application > like > > Zope, or like Apache Tomcat, or JBoss, or IBM Web Sphere, etc... I think > > Rebol has not yet enough power on server-side. More: too many people > like > > imperative-programming. More: there are already a lot of server-side > > languages. > [...] > > IMHO, the only real thing that REBOL lacks for state-of-the-art > server-side apps, is multithreading support (multiprocessing with memory > sharing). But, even without that feature, you can already write very > good and efficient server apps (if you have a good framework). > > -- > DocKimbel > -- > To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to > lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject. > > -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
