> > I like the idea of a REBOL-based approach with a *nix-ish compatibility > layer, but could never justify the time to take it all very far. >
Yes, I agree with you. When I created Jell Console Manager I wanted to create a base structure, then the users could create more commands. I think it is the same concept of every shell: shell is a good starting point, but many users contributed to create specific commands to improve it. Imagine a "bash" without any command: no ls, no pwd, etc.... I think we can create this shell-like system, then everyone can use Rebol to create a set of commands to give more power to the shell-self. I create the base structure (local management, remote management, data exchange, piping, etc...) and other people, one by one, could create and SHARE the rest. On 6/21/06, Gregg Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Alessandro, > > AM> Gregg, those commands function either on Windows and on Linux? > > Yes. It's pure REBOL. > > AM> Where can I find them? > > I don't think I've posted them anywhere, but I'll zap them to you for > review, and we can decide if they're worth posting, if we find others > want to work on this. > > It opens up a lot of questions, and really requires a lot of little > pieces; file globbing, command line processing, redirected I/O, etc. I > like the idea of a REBOL-based approach with a *nix-ish compatibility > layer, but could never justify the time to take it all very far. > > -- Gregg > > -- > To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to > lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject. > > -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
