Hi Sunanda I can confirm that Romano's decompact easily and rapidly handles [1x32768] which is probably enough for the Library for the next couple of decades.
Thanks for the atomic explanation. Regards Peter On Saturday, February 3, 2007, at 07:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Peter: > >> Is this a bug in Rebol? > > You do go all the way with your testing routines! > > Looks like parse is an "atomic" action -- so REBOL is not listening > out for > escape (etc) while executing that one word. > > That is probably true for other REBOL natives too -- but it may be > hard in > many cases to construct something that ran long enough to test that > assumption. > > It would be relatively easy to construct other long running 'parse > actions to > see if that is the case. > > Meanwhile, we may be need to certify Romano's code for compact lists > shorter > than a million :-) > > Sunanda > -- > To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to > lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject. > -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
