On Saturday, 21-April-2007 at 19:25:14 bryan rasmussen wrote, > >Hi, > >There was a big blog brouhaha recently as to if Ruby was an acceptable >LISP, and then steve yegge argued that lisp was not an acceptable lisp >http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2006/04/lisp-is-not-acceptable-lisp.html >, Rebol has always struck me as sort of lisp-y so anyone have any >arguments for Rebol as an acceptable lisp or opinions on where it >fails?
Before the question can be asked, should't we first determine if Rebol's an acceptable Rebol? -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
