Hmmm - thanks. Though for the Windows versions they're talking about 8 and 16 bits-per-pixel. See...
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/binary-releases.php#windows Surely they don't mean image depths!? More likely processor speed, hopefully? -- Carl Read. On Friday, 6-July-2007 at 16:30:23 Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch wrote, >image magik. there even is a rebol integration on rebol.org. > >-MAx > >On 7/3/07, Carl Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> Many thanks - that's nice to know. >> >> And is it too much too hope for that there's a cross-platform solution to >> View's inability to save images as JPEGs? >> >> -- Carl Read. >> >> >> On Tuesday, 3-July-2007 at 9:12:18 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?fran=E7ois_jouen?= >> wrote, >> >> >Hi Carl >> >I'm using rebol/view on Mac Intel: no specific problem for this >> >plateform >> >Le 2 juil. 07 à 23:34, Carl Read a écrit : >> > >> >> >> >> The REBOL/View beta for the Mac is advertised as for PPC based >> >> Macs. Does this mean it won't run on x86 based Macs? >> >> >> >> -- Carl Read. -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
