Hello,

first of all: thank you for everybody.
I learned a lot of tips & tricks!!!!!

I created a "final " solution for my needs (I will use it).

This is the (working) code:

t: make object! [
    myValue: "Z"

    getValue: does [ myValue ]

    t1: none

    f: bind [ t1: button "Show value" [t1/text: getValue show t1] ] 'self
]

l: layout [
    do [
        a: make t [myValue: "A"]
    ]

    do [
        b: make t [myValue: "B"]
    ]

    button "Alert <A>" [prin "Valore A: " a/myValue: input]
    button "Alert <B>" [prin "Valore B: " b/myValue: input]



    pa: box 300x100
    pb: box 300x100
]

pa/pane: layout a/f
pb/pane: layout b/f

view l




I hope this could help someone.

Thank you!






On 7/25/07, Brian Tiffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Maxim;  I like your sequence (and thanks for that), but I'm sticking with
> the
> trick Anton clued me into.  :)
>
> It allows for creation of RebGUI and View apps with ONE exposed global
> name, a
> master object.  Make it an un set-word'ed context and a gui app with full
> cross field checks and balances, linked scrollers et al, can be made that
> exposes ZERO namespace entries.  The (to set-word! in object 'member) is
> staying in my bag of tricks.  It allows for some pretty powerful object
> based
> gui building with the added bonus of not littering.
>
> Christian;  I like your solution too.  A nice exercise in bindology.  I
> learned something by reading it.
>
> Cheers,
> Brian
>
> On Tuesday 24 July 2007 21:15, Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > my god... why is everyone trying to do strange tricks!  even composing a
> > block to get to your ends!!!
> >
> > has everyone forgotten why the do word is defined within VID's dialect?
> >
> > this is THE real solution  ;-)
> >
> > rebol []
> >
> > view layout [
> >     fld: field
> >     do [fld_a: context [value: fld]]
> >     fld: field
> >     do [fld_b: context [value: fld]]
> >     button [
> >         print fld_a/value/text
> >         print fld_b/value/text
> >     ]
> > ]
> >
> >
> > -MAx
> >
> > On 7/24/07, Alessandro Manotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have a problem (my friends say that I have a lot of problems...
> :-(  ).
> > >
> > > Can I create a Rebol/View form, separating the contexts inside?
> > >
> > > What I want to do, is something like this:
> > >
> > > view layout [
> > >
> > > context1 [ f: field ]
> > > context2 [ f: field ]
> > >
> > > button [
> > >    alert context1/f/text
> > >    alert context2/f/text
> > > ]
> > > ]
> > >
> > > Is it feasible? I need to refer the same variable name, insulating it.
> > >
> > > Obviously, in the previous case, the system renders either context1 or
> > >
> > > context2. Final output, when program starts, could be something like:
> > > |==== field in context1 =====|
> > > |==== field in context2 =====|
> > > |
> > > |== button ==|
> > >
> > > Thank you!
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > --Alessandro
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to
> > > lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
> --
> To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to
> lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
>
>


-- 


--Alessandro


-- 
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to 
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.

Reply via email to