Well, I don't need to convince anyone that 2.7.6 differs from earlier 
versions....it's a certainty for me. But don't we agree that the #(20) 
indicates a space character (ASCII) ?
The input is composed more of spaces than any other values (a great waste of 
space which Rebol file/record format remedies). So whether 2.7.6. is different 
or not.....isn't the compare of a single character string being done properly 
here or should I be re-using the 'empty ?' statement to test this field instead 
of 'if"  ?

--- On Tue, 10/14/08, Anton Rolls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Anton Rolls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Seems like a View 2.7.6 "if" statement issue ......???
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, October 14, 2008, 12:00 PM

Hi John,

Which specific version of Rebol was the earlier
you used before ?

I just tried:

        #{20} > " "

in Rebol/View 1.2.1.3.1 21-Jun-2001
and I also get that error. So your earlier version
would probably have to be older than 1.2.1 !

Are you sure your input has not changed ?
Is REC1 supposed to be a binary ?

Regards,

Anton.

John Dutcher wrote:
> Here's the result of inserting the 'probe' in the line noted
below:
> 
> 
> #{20}
> ** Script Error: Expected one of: binary! - not: string!
> ** Near: (probe substr rec1 (y + j) + 2054 1) > " "
> 
> Does this seem to shed light on whether or not there is a fundamental
difference between 
> 2.7.6 and the earlier version   ???
-- 
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to 
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-- 
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to 
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.

Reply via email to