Ed>> Without getting into legal or semantic arguments, I think REBOL is a Ed>> proprietary language. I don't believe a successful case can be made against Ed>> it being proprietary.
Ed>> Ed Thanks for the answers. Maybe I didn't emphasize one thing. The Wikipedia states, that "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth". So, my question was related to the verifiability, taking into account that a publicly acceptable definition of "language proprietarity" does not exist yet. Do you have a definition at hand, which looks like a reasonable starting point to you? TIA Peta -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
