Hi,

thanx this works. But also raises another question for me.

read %lines.txt returns a binary. Why is it possible to omit the to-string and 
still get a decent parse result? Is there an implicit to-string?

Raimund

Am Dienstag 17 Februar 2009 schrieb Peter W A Wood:
> Hi Raimund
>
> This should work with text:
>  >> parse/all read %lines.txt newline
>
> == ["line 1" "line 2" "line 3" "line 4" "line 5"]
>
> Regards
>
> Peter
-- 
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to 
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.

Reply via email to