I think it is not necessary to port/rewrite R2 scripts to R3 unless you = really need some R3 features. R2 is also good and stable. I still have projects on R2, even if R3 is = released I will finish them on R2 anyway.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf = Of Gregg Irwin Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 9:03 PM To: Alan Macleod Subject: [REBOL] Re: Compatibility REBOL 2.x / REBOL 3.0 ? Hi Alan, AM> I would think most scripts in r2 are either small enough to port = with no AM> problem or are looking for an excuse to rewrite: tighten up code, = add new AM> function etc. Not for me. I have production code that is made of large and small scripts, encapped apps, CGIs, and remote services. Qtask.com has a *lot* of REBOL code behind it. Graham Chiu and others also have apps out there for which porting is not an opportunity, but perhaps a necessary (and risky) cost of doing business. -- Gregg --=20 To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to=20 lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject. -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
