I think it is not necessary to port/rewrite R2 scripts to R3 unless you =
really need some R3 features.
R2 is also good and stable. I still have projects on R2, even if R3 is =
released I will finish them on R2 anyway.


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf =
Of Gregg Irwin
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 9:03 PM
To: Alan Macleod
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Compatibility REBOL 2.x / REBOL 3.0 ?


Hi Alan,

AM> I would think most scripts in r2 are either small enough to port =
with no
AM> problem or are looking for an excuse to rewrite: tighten up code, =
add new
AM> function etc.

Not for me. I have production code that is made of large and small
scripts, encapped apps, CGIs, and remote services. Qtask.com has a
*lot* of REBOL code behind it. Graham Chiu and others also have apps
out there for which porting is not an opportunity, but perhaps a
necessary (and risky) cost of doing business.

-- Gregg

--=20
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to=20
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.

-- 
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to 
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.

Reply via email to