Henrik wrote: > It will not work, since / can't be directly converted to a word and > used as a get-word. The trick would be to write it first as a string > and convert it:
> get to-get-word "/" > That is not very pretty, is it? (But keep it in mind, when you need to > convert something unwieldy to a word. :-)) It may not be pretty but I like it. I'm starting with a string anyway so this looks like a nice generic approach. > So we can do something else: ... Nah, I like the first solution better. Thanks, Scott. -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
