Hi Giuseppe, On Sunday, 23-August-2009 at 12:00:52 Giuseppe Chillemi wrote, >I am thinking about introducing a new notation for indirect links. Look at >this: > >A: [1 2 3] >B: C: ::A ;(please notice the double colon) > >B and C now would have a link to whatever A is pointing to. > >If we change A > >A: ["something" 1 2 3] > >Then >PROBE B >and >PROBE C >should return ["something" 1 2 3]
To achieve that currently, I'd do something like this... >> a: [1 2 3] == [1 2 3] >> b: c: :A == [1 2 3] >> probe a [1 2 3] == [1 2 3] >> probe b [1 2 3] == [1 2 3] >> insert a "something" == [1 2 3] >> probe a ["something" 1 2 3] == ["something" 1 2 3] >> probe b ["something" 1 2 3] == ["something" 1 2 3] Is this not enough? -- Carl Read. -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
