Hi Petr,
I don't understand your example, could you expand on it please?
As far as I know load/markup gives back xml as a flat block of tags and
strings - correct?
Or is my verion of Rebol out of date again? :)
Brett.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Petr Krenzelok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 11:35 PM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: XML-Parsing?!?
>
>
> Joel Neely wrote:
>
> > Hi, Patrick,
> >
> > I've been playing with parse-xml for quite a while (in fact, that's
> > what got me to using REBOL seriously in the first place), so let me
> > give a couple of hints that may help.
>
> I just don't understand one thing yet, - why don't you folks use
load/markup?
>
> invoice: load/markup %some-file-received.xml
>
> and then e.g. print invoice/<invoice-number>, as path selection works with
> tags. It's just pity it doesn't allow to use strings, it could be helpful
> sometimes ...
>
> I know you can't check XML doc conformity, but ....
>
> -pekr-
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
> subject, without the quotes.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
