OK, I gotcha. So the "position" in the xml-tags block remains the same after
the function moves the position to the tail UNLESS the xml-tags block is
named again within the function. Therefore, it is better to name the xml-tags
block within the function.
Unless I do this...
In order to be able to write another function within the object which can use
the same xml-tags block instead of naming its own, I need to make each
function return xml-tags to the head of the block at the end of the for loop.
THEN I can have xml-tags outside the functions and useable by any functions
within the object.
(the above understanding was written by a non-programmer. can you tell?)
-Ryan
> Because the by having your static xml-tags block in the
> function it has the effect of doing:
>
> xml-tags: head xml-tags
>
> for each function call.
>
> Otherwise the function leaves the object's xml-tags pegged
> at the tail:
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
