Christian wrote:
> Someone - wasn't it Andrew? - wanted to convert XML's DTDs to REBOL's
parse rules. I must have overseen the :) which followed this idea ...
Here's the smileyface:
:-)
> > ...I haven't got time tonight/this morning to produce a full XML
solution that uses objects. Maybe next week.
> It's fun working with PARSE , even though I'm strongly missing some
features which would help a lot, e.g. a NOT keyword or the possibility to
parse a string TO ["<" | "&" | "]]>"]. Things like that ...
I agree that 'to in the 'parse dialect does seem unnecessarily restricted. I
keep banging my head against 'to's limitations.
Now it would be nice to have a Rebol object! to XML converter.
Andrew Martin
ICQ: 26227169
http://members.nbci.com/AndrewMartin/
-><-
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
