On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 12:24:07PM -0800, Larry Palmiter wrote: > Using Core 2.4.39.3.1 (the Windows version), it seems that now/time/precise > returns a time with a resolution of only 0.01 second, not microsecond or > even millisecond. Is there some way of obtaining the higher precisions > mentioned by you and Jeff. It depends on the Windows version. Windows NT provides the millisecond value correctly, whereas Windows 98 only seems to provide multiples of ten for the millisecond time value. OS limitation... -- Holger Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
- [REBOL] variable number of arguments Graham Chiu
- [REBOL] Re: variable number of arguments Andrew Martin
- [REBOL] Re: variable number of arguments Ladislav Mecir
- [REBOL] Re: variable number of arguments Andrew Martin
- [REBOL] Re: variable number of arguments Ladislav Mecir
- [REBOL] Re: variable number of arguments Tim Johnson
- [REBOL] try fails to catch error Graham Chiu
- [REBOL] Port checking and timers Mat Bettinson
- [REBOL] Re: Port checking and timers Holger Kruse
- [REBOL] Re: Port checking and timers Larry Palmiter
- [REBOL] Re: Port checking and timers Holger Kruse
- [REBOL] Re: Port checking and timers Ladislav Mecir
- [REBOL] Re: try fails to catch error Mat Bettinson
- [REBOL] Append/Restart not permitted Tim Johnson
- [REBOL] Re: Append/Restart not permitted Holger Kruse
- [REBOL] Re: Append/Restart not permitted Tim Johnson
- [REBOL] Re: Append/Restart not permitted Chris
- [REBOL] Re: Append/Restart not permitted Holger Kruse
- [REBOL] Re: Append/Restart not permitted Tim Johnson
- [REBOL] Re: try fails to catch error Graham Chiu
- [REBOL] Re: try fails to catch error jeff
