Hi all,
I promised you to introduce some Variable Number Of Arguments taking
functions, but am not sure, if it is worth the effort, because to design
such a dialect is a time-consuming work. That is why I am tempted to resign
for the time being and return to it later eventually. If you are missing my
explanation why
args-taken? :do reduce [:- 1 2 3]
yields 3, while
args-taken? :- [1 2 3]
yields 1, let me know.
Regards
Ladislav
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
- [REBOL] Re: variable number of arguments Al . Bri
- [REBOL] Re: variable number of arguments Al . Bri
- [REBOL] Re: variable number of arguments Larry Palmiter
- [REBOL] Re: variable number of arguments Ladislav Mecir
- [REBOL] Re: variable number of arguments Andrew Martin
- [REBOL] Re: variable number of arguments Ladislav Mecir
- [REBOL] Re: variable number of arguments Andrew Martin
- [REBOL] Re: variable number of arguments Ladislav Mecir
- [REBOL] Re: variable number of argume... Ladislav Mecir
- [REBOL] REBOL and MySql Ladislav Mecir
- [REBOL] REBOL and MySql Jeff Rubin
- [REBOL] Re: REBOL and MySql sqlab
- [REBOL] REBOL and MySql rply Jarrett Wold
