Hello Jamey!
On 08-Dic-00, you wrote:
JC> I spent about a week on it, off and on, before I got swamped
JC> with other stuff. I was able to get the engine to be able to:
[...]
If you don't mind, I'd like to have a look at it. It could be an
interesting source of ideas. :-)
JC> What is not so important to me:
JC> * Transactions
JC> * Triggers or stored procedures (although they would be nice
JC> :) )
I think that the ability to store code as data would make triggers
and stored procedures very easy to add; REBOL could even make
possible to do new and interesting things...
JC> can think of right now. If you pull something like this off,
JC> I think it would be HUGE for the Rebol community.
I mainly wonder about speed, because using an interpreted language
will always give some penalty wrt native DBMS. Would the greater
simplicity of the REBOL approach justify such a penalty, in your
opinion?
Regards,
Gabriele.
--
Gabriele Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Amigan - REBOL programmer
Amiga Group Italia sez. L'Aquila -- http://www.amyresource.it/AGI/
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
