Hi,
It is a lot of clever programmer
on this list, and the rebol programming concepts
and the rebol shell are the best i ever seen -
but isn't  it so, that those
willing ( and capable) to seriously play with rebol
would't have a chance to do it on their own, without
undescribe certain agreements with RT - i' m not
for or contra open source and read Carl's interview
about "open source is teared off ..." - isn't it (ironically) the rebol
 that could have the undesirable impact from
a lack of -desirable? - wide rebol acceptance in the
programming wold.? Python is a very good example -
just look at what Jim Hinguin , Mark Hammod, Barry Warsaw
did for Python - and here (most) have to look up at RT to see
if they have done something.. - OK, you could say - "how about you?"-
i dont' bother; - i think  that many would'n even think about rebol
if they know it's not open...
Those of you that have definitive insigths about
rebol's development and plans would say - wait,
we have more in the pipeline -!
If i'm  wrong i  would rather hear it.
Thanks
Sascha.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> I agree with you to an extent Petr, but Python has bindings standard
> graphical toolkits like GTK, GNOME, MFC, OPENGL, TK e.t.c which is more
> useful for programmers that have to support existings programs implemeted
> in these toolkits. REBOL is still, in my opinion a great language, but as
> long as  the crucial features like Database support are still missing in
> REBOL/core at present, it would be hard  to convince anyone to use it as an
> allround programming language.
>
> My REBOL interpreter is still installed and would stay installed till....
>
> Regards
>
> Sharriff Aina
>
> P.S APACHE has python modules; MOD-PYTHON..
>
>
>                     Petr
>                     Krenzelok            An:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                     <Petr.Krenzel        Kopie:
>                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]>           Thema:  [REBOL] Re: Antwort: Rebol vs Ruby
>                     Gesendet von:
>                     rebol-bounce@
>                     rebol.com
>
>
>                     20.12.00
>                     08:20
>                     Bitte
>                     antworten an
>                     rebol-list
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I think a better comparism would be :
> >
> > REBOL vs PYTHON
> >
> > check out the features of python (www.python.org) , even Microsoft has
> > shipped a product coded in python. REBOL is a  clean, clear language, but
> > Python is just as clean, and clear, it�s got OOP , Database, and
> bindings
> > to every important graphic  toolkit...ermm ..all for free.
>
> Yes, maybe that's why we lost folks like Tim Peters who was with us during
> Rebol 1.x days and is awarded python supporter? On the other side, the
> question is, if going in the directions where python, php etc. dominates
> will
> make ppl change their minds ...
>
> Look, I would like to see Apache module with Rebol modules, and component
> support in Rebol (to simply load /library component to Rebol/Apache e.g.)
> so
> much, but RT has to get some money first.It will come, I am just not sure
> when.
>
> Do you know btw. TCL and Python commercial attempts both were not
> succesfull?
> ;-) (IIRC ...)
>
> Rebol is OK, we just need it to be more modular, async., faster. Everything
> is
> planned, it will come. While playing with /View for last few weeks I am not
> sure any Python, whatever gfx toolkit can offer something similar to View
> concept ....
>
> Cheers,
> -pekr-
>
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Sharriff Aina
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
> > subject, without the quotes.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
> subject, without the quotes.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
> subject, without the quotes.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the 
subject, without the quotes.

Reply via email to