[REBOL] Re: Back to the Advanced Port stuff again

[Elan]

Hi Paul,

you wrote:
> interesting enough is that when we did a print first waitports we returned
> 'irc-open-port.  When we stepped through the waitports block to the next
> position and did a probe next first waitports we did not return the word
> which we believe was because the script was reducing before appending the
> port object to the block at some point.

That behavior is indeed very interesting. Do you happen to still have
the code segment that exhibited this behavior? What I would be
interested in is the line in which irc-opent-port is added to waitports,
the lines in which other port objects are added to the port, and the
line in which the waitports block is probed, first with "firts", and
then with next.

TIA,

Elan
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the 
subject, without the quotes.