> This indicates that a good idea might be for the client to open a tcp/ip
> connection with a rebol process on the server. This way if the client
> process dies, the connection should (?) timeout - thus dealing with
> problem
> (2). I haven't tried it so ...
[good suggestion: it's IMHO the most safe way to do it. I will test
it ASAP.
Thanks a lot !
chr==
]
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
[REBOL] Re: Concurrent access to data file
CRS - Psy Sel/SPO, COUSSEMENT Christophe, CPN Mon, 19 Feb 2001 05:16:05 -0800
- [REBOL] Re: Concurrent acces... CRS - Psy Sel/SPO, COUSSEMENT Christophe, CPN
- [REBOL] Re: Concurrent ... CRS - Psy Sel/SPO, COUSSEMENT Christophe, CPN
- [REBOL] Re: Concurrent ... CRS - Psy Sel/SPO, COUSSEMENT Christophe, CPN
- [REBOL] Re: Concurr... Gabriele Santilli
- [REBOL] Re: Concurrent ... CRS - Psy Sel/SPO, COUSSEMENT Christophe, CPN
- [REBOL] Re: Concurr... Michal Kracik
- [REBOL] Re: Concurrent ... CRS - Psy Sel/SPO, COUSSEMENT Christophe, CPN
- [REBOL] Re: Concurr... Brett Handley
- [REBOL] Re: Concurr... Andrew Martin
- [REBOL] Re: Concurrent ... CRS - Psy Sel/SPO, COUSSEMENT Christophe, CPN
- [REBOL] Re: Concurr... Andrew Martin
- [REBOL] Re: Concurrent ... CRS - Psy Sel/SPO, COUSSEMENT Christophe, CPN
