Hi,
> my main interest was to discuss the following syntax:
> [ a-func/opt/:bool 123 ]
> where opt and its arguments are passed if 'bool is true.
>
> As an inbuild enhancement request for refinements,
> without need for [do refined].
> It looks similar to the usual path-notation for arrays
> (array/:i), saying »parts of this path are calculatet«.
> And i think it is readable (for few refinements).
>
> IMHO a inbuild »lightweight« refinement-passing would be nice,
> but a proper way is unknown.
> could this be it?
>
> My implementation is to play with the syntax and look if it is handy.
> And to collect some comments from other programmers :)
>
> Volker
>
I think, that there is still a problem with referential transparency. It
doesn't look as a solution I would suggest.
My DO-PATH solution was referentially transparent, something like: [do-path
:a /ref1 if bool [/ref2] /end-path arg1 arg2] is possible too, but there
still seems to be some food for thought.
Regards
Ladislav
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
