On 29-Mar-01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I've got a question, earlier (IIRC) it was said that Rebol/View
> should replace Rebol/Core, that it is Core with the graphics stuff
> added, what happened to this? If it's still supposed to be, why make
> a Rebol/Core/Pro?
They decided against this due to the demand for a Core-only version
being available. Often it's all that's needed, (server-side, for
instance), and so having just Core can save resources.
--
Carl Read
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
