Actually this seems quite buggy on win platform (win2k here). I get a much
longer timeout period with "0:0.5" than I get with "1".
Paul Tretter
----- Original Message -----
From: "Holger Kruse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 1:29 PM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: timeout
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 01:06:08PM -0500, Paul Tretter wrote:
> > Cool Holger, I actually found that timeout after I sent the email. My
new
> > question is that there is no way really to use numbers smaller than "1"
for
> > that value is there? Also I noticed timeout values in the protocol
> > specific schemes such as ftp. What are these values used for.
>
> You can set timeouts to a time! value, e.g. 0:0.5 for half a second.
>
> Protocol-specific timeouts have precedence over the default timeout.
>
> --
> Holger Kruse
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
> subject, without the quotes.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
