[REBOL] Re: [Ping Carl] Re: Need help for justification of using REBOL as devlanguage

[CRS - Psy Sel/SPO, COUSSEMENT Christophe, CPN]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel Neely [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: donderdag 12 april 2001 15:27
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      [REBOL] Re: [Ping Carl] Re: Need help for justification of
> using REBOL  as devlanguage
> 
> Hello, all,
> 
> I've enjoyed lurking through this thread.  Many good ideas have been
> raised.
> In attempting to justify REBOL in a specific environment, I suggest that
> it
> would also be good to address head-on some of the likely objections that
> could be raised (depending on the audience):
> 
         <major snip> 
        [
        Well Joel, what an answer !

        I seems you've a lot of experience dealing with this kind of
situation ;-)
        I particularly enjoyed the objections which could be raised ...
sound so familiar !

        Anyway, you've done a great job here, thanks for that !
        There are a lot of arguments I could use in my analysis...

        About your thoughts concerning the ratio instructions/statement: I
had already the feeling the answer was going that way.
        From there my question to Carl ... 
        I'm happy my feeling seems to be right: the high extensibility of
REBOL does not set any upper limit to the ratio. 
        The potential of REBOL gives me still the sensation of putting a
first step in an unknown world, where everything is possible.
        ... Just dreaming ;-)) ...

        Thanks again for your work !

        Cheers,

        chr==
        ]  
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the 
subject, without the quotes.