From: "Mat Bettinson" > Is it just me or does Rebol's wait command use pretty much 100% CPU? > > I've just noticed this on a document tracking script which > periodically scans directories but spends most of it's time in a wait > command. > > This is rebol/command runtime compiled. Win98 on 500mhz deCeleron with 128 mb ram and /View 1.1, a wait uses at most 2% of the cpu cycles. For what its worth. --Scott Jones -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
- [REBOL] View-Pro 1.1 available for more platforms Holger Kruse
- [REBOL] Re: [ALLY] View-Pro 1.1 available for more pl... P-O Yliniemi
- [REBOL] Re: View-Pro 1.1 available for more platf... Alan Crandall
- [REBOL] [ALLY] Re: View-Pro 1.1 available for mor... bill
- [REBOL] Rebol wait eating CPU? Mat Bettinson
- [REBOL] Re: Rebol wait eating CPU? Mat Bettinson
- [REBOL] Re: Rebol wait eating CPU? GS Jones
- [REBOL] Re: Rebol wait eating CPU? Mat Bettinson
- [REBOL] Re: View-Pro 1.1 available for more platforms Steve Shireman
- [REBOL] Re: View-Pro 1.1 available for more platforms Kolbj�rn Barmen
- [REBOL] Re: View-Pro 1.1 available for more platf... Carl Read
- [REBOL] Re: View-Pro 1.1 available for more p... Holger Kruse
- [REBOL] Re: View-Pro 1.1 available for mo... Mat Bettinson
- [REBOL] Re: View-Pro 1.1 available f... Kolbj�rn Barmen
- [REBOL] Re: View-Pro 1.1 available for mo... Kolbj�rn Barmen
- [REBOL] Re: View-Pro 1.1 available for more platf... Holger Kruse
- [REBOL] Re: View-Pro 1.1 available for more p... Kolbj�rn Barmen
