The Telephone/local below would actually break or at least be more complicated in Oregon where we have gone to 10 digit dialing. Some nonesense about too many cell phones and pagers... I think that it would have made a lot of sense to put them on their own area code(s), but the PUC didn't. Previously, you (Andrew Martin) wrote: > How about adding the telephone number to Rebol? For example: > Telephone: +64-6-8354110 > >> type? Telephone > == telephone! > It would behave a lot like the issue! datatype, but have telephone! > datatype. Refinements could include: > >> Telephone/International > == +64 > >> Telephone/National > == 6 > >> Telephone/Local > == 8354110 > The rebol parser rule could be: > "+" some Digit "-" some Digit "-" some Digit > > The only trouble I have at the moment is determining if is this pattern > would be suitable for other countries. While this works for NZ, it might not > work for other nations. Any one know if this wouldn't work for them? > > Andrew Martin > ICQ: 26227169 http://members.nbci.com/AndrewMartin/ > -><- > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the > subject, without the quotes. > > -- David L. Hawley D.L. Hawley and Associates 1.503.274.2242 Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
